• darkblurbg

    CPSA Students Caucus Meeting

    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg

    Workshop: The Official Languages Act at 50
    Le 50e anniversaire de la Loi sur les langues officielles

    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg

    Reception: Department of Political Science
    University of British Columbia

    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg
    Association canadienne de science politique
    Programme du congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019


    Organisé à l'Université de la Colombie-Britannique
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 au jeudi 6 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg
    Discours présidentiel
    François Rocher, CPSA President

    Vie et mort d’un enjeu
    la science politique canadienne
    et la politique québécoise

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 | 17 h 00 - 18 h 00
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote: UBCIC Grand
    Chief Stewart Phillip

    Asserting Indigenous
    Title and Rights in 2019

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 | 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote Speaker: Wendy Brown
    In the Ruins of Neoliberalism:
    Our Predicaments:
    the Rise of Anti-democratic
    Politics in the West

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mercredi le 5 juin 2019 | 14 h 00 - 15 h 30
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote Speaker: Roland Paris
    Canada Alone?
    Surviving in a Meaner World

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Jeudi le 6 juin 2019 | 10 h 30 - 12 h 00

Comportement politique/sociologie

F19(a) - Social Movements and Protest Behavior

Date: Jun 6 | Heure: 01:30pm to 03:00pm | Location: SWING 310

Chair/Président/Présidente : Filip Kostelka (University of Essex)

Discussant/Commentateur/Commentatrice : Alexie Labelle (Université de Montréal)

Uncertainty Framing of Environmental Disasters and the Willingness to Protest: Miriam Matejova (University of British Columbia), Eric Merkley (University of British Columbia)
Abstract: Major environmental disasters generate uncertainty, which becomes a crucial element of post-disaster political dynamics. Yet, aside from a few studies of uncertainty in environmental discourse and political behaviour, political effects of uncertainty have not received much attention from scholars. The purpose of this project is to gain an understanding of the effects of uncertainty communication on public willingness to participate in non-violent protest such as peaceful demonstrations, petitions or boycotts. Specifically, we ask: Why does post-disaster uncertainty dampen public willingness to protest in some cases but encourages it in others? We rely on the findings of a text analysis of news media coverage of three major industrial environmental disasters linked to varying degrees of post-disaster protest: the Mount Polley mine leak, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Drawing on the existing literature on framing and motivated reasoning, we propose new hypotheses related to the effects of uncertainty on people’s willingness to protest. We test these through a survey experiment of 3,600 adults in the United States. Our preliminary results challenge the psychological literature on demobilizing effects of uncertainty. The effectiveness of the uncertainty framing is conditional on political ideology, with more liberal respondents being more likely to resist such framing and therefore more likely to participate in a protest activity. This finding reveals a new interaction effect between uncertainty and political ideology, one that warrants further investigations.

Speaking Truth in Authoritarian Contexts: A Case Study of Human Rights Violations in Northern Uganda: Stephanie Bacher (University of Ottawa)
Abstract: From 1986 to 2006, the Acholi sub-region of northern Uganda was ravaged by civil war, during which both the Lord’s Resistance Army insurgent group and the Ugandan government committed numerous human rights violations. A number of scholars and civil society organizations have since then brought to light the truth about what really happened in the sub-region in an effort to counter the government’s official discourse on the civil war. This presentation will present the Ugandan government’s strategies to control the information and narrative about the armed conflict and how civil society organizations and scholars found ways to speak truth despite the authoritarian context. The findings presented are based on a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews conducted in the cities of Kampala and Gulu from August to October 2018.