• darkblurbg





    CPSA Students Caucus Meeting








    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg




    Workshop: The Official Languages Act at 50
    Le 50e anniversaire de la Loi sur les langues officielles








    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg




    Reception: Department of Political Science
    University of British Columbia








    Congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019 - 4 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg
    Association canadienne de science politique
    Programme du congrès annuel de l'ACSP 2019

    LA POLITIQUE AUTREMENT;
    PARLER FRANC, PARLER VRAI

    Organisé à l'Université de la Colombie-Britannique
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 au jeudi 6 juin 2019
  • darkblurbg
    Discours présidentiel
    François Rocher, CPSA President

    Vie et mort d’un enjeu
    la science politique canadienne
    et la politique québécoise

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 | 17 h 00 - 18 h 00
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote: UBCIC Grand
    Chief Stewart Phillip

    Asserting Indigenous
    Title and Rights in 2019

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mardi le 4 juin 2019 | 10 h 30 - 12 h 00
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote Speaker: Wendy Brown
    In the Ruins of Neoliberalism:
    Our Predicaments:
    the Rise of Anti-democratic
    Politics in the West

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Mercredi le 5 juin 2019 | 14 h 00 - 15 h 30
  • darkblurbg
    Keynote Speaker: Roland Paris
    Canada Alone?
    Surviving in a Meaner World

    Location: CIRS 1250
    Jeudi le 6 juin 2019 | 10 h 30 - 12 h 00

Droit et analyse de politiques



D14(a) - Courts and Canadians

Date: Jun 5 | Heure: 03:45pm to 05:15pm | Location: SWING 206

Chair/Président/Présidente : Troy Riddell (Guelph University)

Discussant/Commentateur/Commentatrice : Troy Riddell (Guelph University)

Measuring Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court of Canada: Erin Crandall (Acadia University), Andrea Lawlor (University of King's College)
Abstract: Public support is a critical component of any court’s institutional legitimacy; however, questions remain regarding the roots and durability of such support. While research concerning public confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court is now well developed and has demonstrated that there is considerable diffuse support for the institution, comparative research on public support for courts remains limited. Using survey data collected in 2015 that explores public attitudes towards the Supreme Court of Canada, this paper will help to fill this gap. The timing of this survey is especially relevant, given the relatively tumultuous relationship between the Canadian Supreme Court and the federal government of Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper in 2014-15. The possible effects of political controversy on the diffuse and specific for the Supreme Court will therefore be given particular attention.


Tweet Justice: Canadian Courts in the Digital Age: Tamara A Small (University of Guelph), Kate Puddister (University of Guelph)
Abstract: For the past decade, Canadian courts have been grappling with how to integrate digital technologies into court administration. Digital technologies could impact courts in a number of ways, including the use of electronic records, the admissibility of electronic documents and the use of live text-based communication in courts by journalists and the public. In this paper, we explore how the courts, themselves, have embraced social media. A former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria (Australia) once noted that social media present an “exhilarating opportunity for the Courts to tell the public we serve who we are.” On one hand, courts could use social media as just another way to provide already publicly available court materials such as transcripts and daily court listings. On the other hand, courts could actually engage in dialogue with followers on various aspects of the judicial process. Considering that traditionally courts only engage with the public through issuing decisions, both have the capacity to increase access to justice, which is central to fostering public confidence in the judiciary. In the case of the former, court social media provides an opportunity for the public to what experience courts do unmediated by journalists. While the latter offers the capacity to redefining the relationship between courts and the public, thereby extending the principle of open court. This paper will explore the extent which Canadian courts have embraced digital technologies by creating social media accounts and explore how they




Acceuil